<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://experience.fellowshipone.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>One church or a loose confederation of ministries?</title><link>http://experience.fellowshipone.com/blogs/dynamic_church/archive/2006/12/05/One-church-or-a-loose-confederation-of-ministries_3F00_.aspx</link><description>We get to know a lot of churches in conjunction with our implementation of Fellowship One; currently we have sold over 500 churches. Plus we have talked to a whole lot more through the selling process. Clearly there are two different kinds of churches;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>re: One church or a loose confederation of ministries?</title><link>http://experience.fellowshipone.com/blogs/dynamic_church/archive/2006/12/05/One-church-or-a-loose-confederation-of-ministries_3F00_.aspx#751</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:55:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">87eee960-b871-44cb-8a98-02588a960c04:751</guid><dc:creator>newsaddikt</dc:creator><description>as a DBM it seems i constantly fight the creation/usage of data silos.
many posts here mention how churches aren't a "dynamic church." do you have any success stories of how churches have changed from "undynamic" to "dynamic?"</description></item></channel></rss>